Abstract
The paper examined the effect of a STEAM-based mathematics teaching intervention on students’ numerical fluency and gender differences in secondary schools within Tubah Sub-Division, Mezam Division, North West Region of Cameroon. The study employed a quasi-experimental design, involving 43 students from CCAST Bambili as the experimental group and 34 students from Technical High School Ntigi as the control group. Both groups were pre-tested on a common Form Three mathematics topic in statistics, before the experimental group was exposed to a three-week STEM-oriented instructional treatment. Post-test scores were then collected from both groups. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including mean comparisons, t-tests, and graphical representations. Findings revealed that the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the post-test means score with an independent sample t-test showing t(75) = 6.42, p<0.001, demonstrating that STEAM-integrated instruction improved students’ engagement with mathematical tasks. Additionally, gender-based analysis revealed that female students in the experimental group achieved higher mean scores than their male peers, with a significant difference observed (t(41) =2.11, p<0.05). Suggesting that inclusive and context-sensitive STEAM pedagogies foster female learners’ achievement in mathematics, thereby challenging traditional gender performance gaps. Relying on these findings, the study concluded that STEAM-based teaching interventions are effective in fostering numerical proficiency among arts-oriented students while also reducing gender disparities in mathematics achievement. It recommended that mathematics teachers should adopt STEAM-oriented approaches to enhance critical thinking and problem-solving, and that educational policymakers should integrate gender-responsive STEAM practices into the curriculum to promote equity and inclusiveness in secondary school mathematics education.
References
Amalina, L., Horváth, Á., & Gazdag, K. (2022). A mathematical problem-solving framework-based integrated STEM: Theory and practice. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 105-123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v5i1.105
Beers, S. Z. (2018). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future. National Education Association. https://www.yinghuaacademy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/10/21st_century_skills.pdf
Bidita L. R. (2024). Pedagogical Approach in STEM Education: A Literature Review. 13(9) International Journal of Engineering Research and DOI: 10.17577/IJERTV13IS090039
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J. and Van Petegem, P. (2022). Integrated STEM Education: The
Effects of a Long-Term Intervention on Students’ Cognitive Performance. European Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/12738
Denis & Lenora Foretia Foundation. (n.d.). About The STEM Prize. Foretia Foundation. https://www.foretiafoundation.org/the-stem-prize/about-stem-prize/
Di Tommaso, M. L., Contini, D., De Rosa, D., Ferrara, F., Piazzalunga, D., & Robutti, O. (2024). Tackling the gender gap in mathematics with active learning methodologies. Economics of Education Review, 100, Article 102538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102538.
Elliniadou E. & Sofianopoulou C. (2022). A STEM intervention on Students’ Attitudes Towards Science. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766715.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
Frontiers in Education. (2025). Evaluating gender gaps in STEM achievement in African secondary schools: A quantile regression and mediation analysis approach. Frontiers in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1607412.
Cameroon General Certificate of Education Board (2024). Press Communiqué Releasing Results of the 2024 Examinations Organized by the GCE Board. https://camgceb.org/results-statistics/performance-by-subjects/
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.middleweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/STEM-Integration-in-K12-Education.pdf
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494–495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364
Lestari, I. F. (2021). Experiential learning using STEM approach in improving students’ problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012005
Marcela S. & Alsina A. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Integrated STEAM Education in Early Childhood and Primary Education Teachers. 13(8):842. Education Sciences. DOI: 10.3390/educsci13080842
Marja G. B. & Namukas I. K. (2022). A pedagogical model for STEAM education. 16(1)
Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning. DOI: 10.1108/JRIT-12-2021-0081
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. https://www.iea.nl/publications/timss-2015-international-results-mathematics
Nekang F. N. & Cheny J. N. (2024). Gender parity in the teaching of Science, Technology, Engineering and mathematics (STEM) in Cameroon. International Journal on Integrated Education,7(1).76-84. https://journals.researchparks.org/index.php/IJIE/article/view/5175/4770
Sáinz, M., & Müller, J. (2018). Gender and STEM in higher education: Results from the STEM gender equality project. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1405243
Smith, J., Jones, M., & Brown, R. (2022). Mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teaching strategies when adopting a STEM approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-025-00520-9
Tian, J., Ren, K., Newcombe, N. S., Weinraub, M., Vandell, D. L., & Gunderson, E. A. (2022). Tracing the origins of the STEM gender gap: The contribution of childhood spatial skills. Developmental Science, 26(2), e13302. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13302
Xie, G., & colleagues. (2023). Gender in mathematics: How gender role perception influences mathematical capability in junior high school. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00188-3
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O.-L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w