Keywords
How to Cite
Share
Abstract
This study investigates how the classification or archival records influence the preservation of cultural heritage in the National Archives in Cameroon. Although classification is globally recognized as the foundation of archival function, its specific contribution to preservation outcomes in Cameroon remains underexplored. remains under-theorized. Archives Using a qualitative case study design, the study engaged five purposively selected senior archival personnel through semi-structured interviews. The sample size was justified by the specialized expertise required, and the study focuses on depth of insight rather than statistical generalization, consistent with a qualitative case study. Data were analysed thematically with a code check to enhance rigor. Findings reveal that the National Archives employs a combination of alphanumeric, subject-based, and thematic classification systems, which collectively enhance intellectual control, retrieval efficiency, and the physical safeguarding of cultural heritage materials. However, the effectiveness of these systems is significantly constrained by inadequate infrastructure, limited storage space, insufficient equipment, the absence of ICT-supported classification tools, and chronic underfunding. The study demonstrates that the classification contributes to preservation primarily by reducing handling, improving traceability, and supporting systematic arrangement, but its potential remains underutilized due to structural and technological limitations. The article argues that strengthening classification practices requires a coordinated investment in modern ICTs, standardized archival infrastructure, professional training, and sustainable funding. The study contributes empirical evidence to African archival scholarship by clarifying the direct link between classification practices and preservation outcomes in a resource-constrained national archival system.
References
Alberts, I., Schellinck, J., Eby, C. & Marleau, Y. (2010). Bridging functions and processes for records management. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 34(4), 365–390.
Buchanan, A. (2018). Archival Arrangement and Description. The Encyclopedia of Archival Science.
Buchholz, T. (2015). Preservation of Digital Records: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Archival Organization, 12(1-2), 5-24.
Calabria, T. (2006). Case study (2004): evaluating Caloundra City Council’s EDMS classification. Step Two Designs. Retrieved August 25, 2007, from http://www.steptwo.com.au/files/kmc_caloundracouncil.pdf.
Connelly, J. (2007). Functional taxonomies: myth or magic?The Informaa Quarterly, 27(4), 18–22.
Cook, M. (2000). The management of information from archives (2nd ed.).
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE publication.
Duranti, L. (2010). The Interpares Approach to Preservation of Authentic Records. Preservation of Electronic Records: the new knowledge and decision making.
Foscarini, F. (2009). Function-based records classification systems: An exploratory study of records management practices in central banks (PhD thesis). The University of the British Columbia. Retrieved on January 11, 2021, from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0067282.
Gunnlaugsdóttir, J. (2012). Functional classification scheme for records: FCS: a way to chart documented knowledge in organizations. Records Management Journal, 22(2), 116–129.
Hart, S. (2015). Entry: Records classification. In L. Duranti & P. C. Franks (Eds.), Encyclopedia of archival science (pp. 331-334). Roman & Littlefield.
International Council of Archives (2000). General International Standard Archival Description.
International Council of Archives. (2016). Conservation of Records, Documentary and other Archival Materials.
International Standard Organization. (2001). ISO 15489: Information and documentation - Records management. Part 1: General (1st ed.).
Johnson, K. (2015). Archival theory and practice. Pearson Education.
Lowry, J. (2019). Records continuum model. International encyclopedia of information and library science (2nd ed.)
Mata, C. M. (2017). Elements and relationships within a records classification scheme. Journal on African Literature, 8(2), 19-33. Retrieved on May 09, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12374.
Millar, L. A. (2003). Archives: Principles and Practice in Records Management and Archives. Received on March 2020 from, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/document.
Miller, M. F. (2017). Archival arrangement and description (2nd ed.). society of American Archivists.
Mokhtar, U. & Yusof, Z. (2015). Classification: the understudied concept. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 176–182.
National Archives of Australia. (2008). Specifications for electronic records management systems software and guidelines for implementing the specifications for electronic records management systems software (ERMS). Retrieved December 31, 2022, from http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/publications/ERMS-specs.aspx.
Orr, S. (2005). Functions-based classification of records: Is it functional? (Master’s thesis). Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228787956.
Packalén, S. (2015). Functional classification: record-keeping professionals’ difficulties and their handling in maintenance and use of FC in Finnish organisations. Records Management Journal, 25(2), 166–182.
Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival & records terminology. Society of American Archivists.
Say, M. (2020). Archival principles and practice. Routledge.
Shepherd, E., & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing records: A handbook of principles and practice. Facet Publishing.
Singh, P., Klobas, J., & Anderson, K. (2007). Information seeking behaviour of electronic records management systems (ERMS) users: Implications for records management practices. Human IT, 9(1), 135–181.
Smith, K. (2007). Public sector records management: A practical guide. Ashgate.
UNESCO. (2020). Memory of the world: safeguarding documentary heritage.
Upward, F. (2000). Modelling the continuum as a paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: A personal reflection. Records Management Journal, 10(3), 115-139.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE publications.
